Editorial planning
Query, language and market: three separate choices
Query, language and market are not the same decision. Treat them as one and you risk writing in the wrong language for the wrong audience. Here is how to keep them apart.
Picture an editorial plan for a site that sells furniture in Italy but also gets enquiries from Switzerland and Austria. The query is "small apartment sofa bed", the language is Italian, the market is Italy. These are three different decisions. The query describes what a person is looking for. The language sets the idiom you write in. The market tells you who the offer is for. Treat them as a single choice and you may end up writing in Italian for a German market, or translating a query without adapting it to the audience. In RankAI the proposed version still needs human approval. Automatic publishing is turned on per site and still goes through the checks. On the technical trial the limits are 3 articles per month and 3 in total.
Why the three choices stay separate
A query is a search expression: it shifts with the way people phrase the need. Language is the code you write in. It can match the language of the query, but not necessarily. The market is the commercial and regulatory context in which the content has to make sense. An article in Italian can serve an Italian market and an Italian-speaking Swiss market, but not the same German market. Keeping the three choices distinct stops you from pinning on one variable an effect that depends on the others.
A concrete case
If the query is in English but the market is Italian, the language of the content can stay Italian, and the query should be read as a signal of intent, not as the language of publication. Change the market and the examples, units of measurement and regulatory references change too, while the query can stay exactly the same.
RankAI's working proposal: before you approve a version, check the three choices one at a time. Start with the query and ask what need it expresses. Then check the language of the text and whether it matches the query. Finally, check the market the content is meant for. If any of the three is not explicit, stop and ask for confirmation instead of inferring it. This order is not a universal standard, but a procedure that cuts down overlap. In an SEO editorial plan, note the three choices next to each entry, so that human approval covers a version with readable parameters rather than an indistinct bundle. Automatic publishing, when it is active for a site, still goes through the checks: the three choices still have to be recorded first.
What you can still verify
RankAI does not promise rankings and does not measure search volumes. The verifiable limit is this: on the technical trial, 3 articles per month and 3 in total are available, and human approval remains the default. For the full picture of the editorial plan, see the in-depth page.